Archive for September, 2009

RE-MEMBERING OUR FRIENDS

Monday, September 28th, 2009

n744573915_1229404_6121.jpg Join hearts in a peaceful, prayerful vigil for the animal victims of our food choices

World Farmed Animals Day 2009
Bay Area Slaughterhouse Vigils
Friday, OCTOBER 2, 2009
5:00-8:00P

Bring poems, prayers, drawings and photos of safe & loved farmed animals, flowers, rocks/stones (as in the Jewish tradition of placing them on gravestones) and your big, open hearts to any of the following slaughterhouse locations to stand up & together for the innocent & voiceless

Slaughterhouse Vigil Location 1:
Rancho Veal Corp
1522 Petaluma Blvd N
Petaluma, CA 94952
(cows & calves killed here)

Slaughterhouse Vigil Location 2:
Fulton Processors, Inc.
1200 River Rd
Fulton, CA, 95439
(chickens killed here)

*Vigils happening at both locations simultaneously.

WORLD FARMED ANIMALS DAY, observed on (or around) October 2nd, is a time dedicated to exposing, mourning, and memorializing the needless suffering and killing of the more than 55 billion cows, pigs, turkeys, chickens, and other sentient land animals in the world’s factory farms and slaughterhouses. It is a time for all to speak out against the atrocities and brutalization of animals raised for meat, eggs, and dairy. The annual occasion is observed with activities in all 50 U.S. states and two dozen other countries and the date marks the birthday of ethical vegetarian Mahatma Gandhi. http://www.wfad.org/

For more info please contact: katedanaher@animalearthhuman.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Animal testing on the rise?

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

thumb_1_1252250766-0.jpg

neurope.eu

Despite continuous efforts from the world’s animal rights organizations the numbers of companies and scientific laboratories still utilizing animal testing seem to be rising.

At the start of the year’s most important conference on the development of alternatives to animal testing, animal welfare groups are expressing concern over the increasing number of animals used for experiments.

Laying aside the progress made since the terminology like Replacement, Reduction and Refinement of animal testing was instigated in order to aid the cause worldwide introduced 50 years ago, the number of animals used annually for research in the European Union is more than 12.1 million, according to the latest EU statistics (2), and is still rising.

At the beginning of the 7th World Congress on Alternatives & Animal Use in the Life Sciences, which takes place in Rome from August 30 to September 3, Eurogroup for Animals is expressing its hope that the event, which will bring together worldwide representatives of NGOs, industry and science as well as authorities and decision-makers, will mark a new chapter for animals used in research.

The Congress’s motto is ‘Calling on Science’, and aims to highlight scientific progress covering innovative technologies, areas of animal use including the development of pharmaceuticals and safety assessment of specific product types, and scientific developments relevant to the 3Rs.

“The increase in numbers shows that relying on science is not enough,” says Sonja Van Tichelen, Director of Eurogroup for Animals. “Fifty years on from the introduction of the 3Rs, we now stand at a crossroads where major policy decisions must be taken to speed up the progress towards non-animal research. A coherent strategy, combined with EU and worldwide collaboration is absolutely essential to reach our targets.”

Eurogroup feels that a far stricter scrutiny of the use of animals is required for all research, including EU-funded projects; that more investment should be made into alternatives to animal testing, that a review of all legislative requirements involving animal use, such as food safety, should be undertaken as well as an impact assessment for all new policies; and that the EU should adopt an overall coherent strategy to work towards phasing out all animal use.

Examples in Japan pointed out by the Japan Anti-Vivisection Association (JAVA), who often work with PETA Asia Pacific, recently reported that Japanese cosmetics giant Shiseido continues their reliance on animal tests for its products, which include wrinkle creams and perfumes.

S. Korean wages a visual campaign against dog eating

Thursday, September 3rd, 2009

490516611.jpg

One activist uses graphic images to make his case. South Koreans are increasingly taking the lead in their country in promoting animal rights, going so far as to question their cultural traditions.

Reporting from Seoul - As Lee Won-bok arranged his posters one Saturday at a busy outdoor pedestrian mall, passersby peeked over his shoulder in dismay and horror.

Some covered their eyes. But hundreds also clamored to sign Lee’s petition to outlaw a traditional culinary practice here: the eating of dog meat.

Each weekend, the 45-year-old animal rights activist stages a graphic photo display of dogs kept in cages, hanged and butchered, their meat prepared for market. He knows the images are hard to look at. But that’s precisely his point, to show the harsh treatment of an animal that many South Koreans now view as companions, not cuisine.

For years, foreign advocates have railed against the practice of butchering dogs and cats. Although Koreans have eaten dogs for centuries, the habit became more prevalent during the privations that followed the Korean War. It eventually spread from the poor and elderly to be adopted by the more affluent as niche cuisine.

Most protests were dismissed as the unwanted opinions of outsiders. But as the country has acquired more trappings of Western culture, the number of pet owners has exploded, and South Koreans are taking the lead in promoting animal rights here.

In recent years, at least nine domestic groups against eating dog have been founded to stage street and online campaigns nationwide.

“People don’t comprehend the suffering these dogs endure,” Lee said. “They may vaguely realize that people still eat dogs. But they need to know what happens to the animals.”

Lee, founder of the Korea Assn. of Animal Protection, gets in people’s faces. He has barged into City Hall to confront an official who favored consuming dog meat and brazenly displayed his photos at a local dog market as a vendor tried to choke him.

He represents a new breed of animal rights activist: a South Korean who aggressively questions the traditions of his own culture.

“Pets are now objects of emotional interaction, just as in Western society,” said Joo Eun-woo, a sociology professor at Chung-Ang University in Seoul. “Some people sleep with their dogs. For them, seeing these animals as food is taboo.”

In 2005, one in four South Koreans was a dog or cat owner. In addition, the number of pet shops and animal-themed television shows have risen in the nation of 48 million people.

South Koreans wield more influence than foreign activists, said Lee, who has been a vegetarian for 20 years. “People can no longer say, ‘Outsiders can’t tell us what to eat.’ Now Koreans are telling Koreans.”

On some weekend days, he is able to collect more than 1,000 signatures. He says he has amassed 300,000 over nine years.

“We are a new generation of Koreans, and it’s up to us to stop this practice,” said Won Ji-yeon, 17, who stood in line to sign Lee’s list.

National laws prohibit eating dog meat, but the government rarely enforces them. Dog markets are rarely, if ever, inspected for health and sanitary conditions.

Six years ago, a local court rebuffed a lawsuit that Lee filed seeking to suspend sales of dog meat soup, called boshintang, ruling that eating soup made from dog was too prevalent a custom to prohibit. But Lee and others successfully lobbied the government to outlaw the butchering of pet dogs that stray from their masters.

Canine cuisine enthusiasts say they distinguish between dogs they eat and those kept as pets. They say they reserve a special breed of dog for consumption, never mixing the two.

Activists say the lines often blur. Many domesticated breeds, including collies and spaniels, are also consumed after being scooped up as runaways. Lee rescues stray dogs as a way to keep them out of the hands of dog meat vendors.

On the three days each year when many South Koreans traditionally eat boshintang, activists stage street protests, portraying dogs kept in cages and hanged for their meat — anything, they say, to diminish the outmoded appetite for dog meat.

But the cuisine has its adherents.

Last month, on the year’s final boshintang day, the regulars packed into Mr. Moon’s Dog Meat Stew Restaurant, where the year-round menu includes not only boshintang, but also dog soup and dog served with vegetables and hot pepper sauce, along with non-dog dishes.

Hong Sung-woo said dog stew is healthy.

“It gives me stamina,” said the former government worker, now 84. “How do you think I’ve lived this long?”

The cuisine also remains popular among some government officials, including Cham Lee, the German-born director of the Korean Tourism Organization, who also raises Korean Jindo dogs as pets. He elicited criticism when he held a private wine and dog-tasting seminar. His verdict: Dog goes best with a light Shiraz, or a nice Riesling.

Parisians can eat horse meat because France is considered high culture, he said. But South Korea gets no such pass.

“Westerners eat one type of animal and tell the world they can’t eat another,” he said. “I say, if you eat animals, you eat animals.”

Lee, the activist, pledges to continue his campaign until the practice of eating dog ends.

He uses the signatures he collects to make the case to legislators that the public is on his side.

“Dog eating in Korea is not going to end in one day or one year,” he said. “But it’s only a matter of time.”

john.glionna@latimes.com

Park is an assistant in The Times’ Seoul Bureau.